Penentuan Kualitas Madu Ditinjau dari Kadar Sukrosa dengan Metode Luff Schoorl

Determination of Honey Quality in terms of Sucrose Content with the Luff School Method

Authors

  • Novriyanti Lubis Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Garut, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Sofi Sofiyani Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Garut, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Effan Cahyati Junaedi Universitas Garut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25026/jsk.v4i3.1050

Keywords:

Honey, Sucrose, Luff schoorl

Abstract

Determining of the quality of honey reviewed from sucrose level with Luff Schoorl method had been done. On this research, 4 samples was taken and obtained from center market in Garut city. The samples were tested quantitatively by luff schoorl method. The principle of this method was iodometry because of iodide ion used as the basis for the determination of sugar levels. The results showed that sucrose level from 4 samples, such as A, B, C, and D honey were of 1.29; 9.12; 13.91; and 5.64% sequentially. These things showed that only A honey samples had sucrose level which corresponds to the rules of standard quality of honey, while the other three samples such as B, C, and D honey had the sucrose level did not match to the rules of standard quality.The quality standard of honey accordance to SNI 01-3545-2004 was ? 5%.

References

[1] Yuliarti, N. 2015. Khasiat Madu Untuk Kesehatan Dan Kecantikan. Yogyakarta: Andi.

[2] Adji, and Suranto. 2004. Khasiat Dan Manfaat Madu Herba 1. Jakarta.

[3] Sukmariah, and Maun. 1997. “Pemalsuan Madu Dengan Sakarosa.” 18(1):10.

[4] Jarvis, D. 2003. Pengobatan Tradisional Dengan Madu Dan Apel. Bandung: Pionir Jaya.

[5] Ratnayani, K., and Adhi. 2008. “Penentuan Kadar Glukosa Dan Fruktosa Pada Madu Randu Dan Madu Kelengkeng Dengan Metode Kromatografi Cair Kinerja Tinggi.” Jurnal Kimia 2(2):77–86.

[6] Poedjiadi, M., and Titin S.F.M. 2006. Dasar - Dasar Biokimia. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

[7] Irpan, Taufik, and Imam. 2016. “Comparison of Reduction Sugar Analysis Method in Cilembu Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas l.) Using Luff Schoorl and Anthrone Method.” Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan Indonesia 7(5):219–26. doi: 10.5151/cidi2017-060.Harmita. 2004. “Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Validasi Metode Dan Cara Perhitungannya.” Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian 1(3):2004.

[8] Rina, and Yenrina. 2008. Metode Analisis Bahan Pangan Dan Komponen Bioaktif” , Andalas University Press, Padang, Hlm. 29-31. Padang: Andalas University Press.

[9] Riyanto, Ph. D. 2014. Validasi Dan Verifikasi Metode Uji” , Edisi I, Penerbit Deepublish, Yogyakarta, Hlm. 21-78. Edisi I. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

[10] Harmita. 2004. “Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Validasi Metode Dan Cara Perhitungannya.” Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian 1(3):2004.

[11] BPOM. 2014. “Info POM.”

[12] Purbaya, J. .. 2007. Mengenal Dan Memanfaatkan Khasiat Madu Alami. Bandung: Penerbit Pinonir Jaya.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Lubis, N., Sofiyani, S., & Junaedi, E. C. (2022). Penentuan Kualitas Madu Ditinjau dari Kadar Sukrosa dengan Metode Luff Schoorl: Determination of Honey Quality in terms of Sucrose Content with the Luff School Method. Jurnal Sains Dan Kesehatan, 4(3), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.25026/jsk.v4i3.1050

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.